MEC Practice Academy 11.19
News|Slideshows|June 12, 2024

Defining long COVID – a slideshow

National Academy of Medicine proposes a standard way to discuss ‘a widespread, poorly understood medical condition.’

After tremendous effects on the health of people and society, many physicians and patients are happy the worst of the COVID-19 pandemic has passed.

But for some patients, health problems from the pandemic still linger. For all the physical symptoms and conditions, there are various schools of thought about how medicine, science and society should define long COVID.

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) has published its new report listing the characteristics of “an infection-associated chronic condition that occurs after COVID-19 infection and is present for at least three months as a continuous, relapsing and remitting, or progressive disease state that affects one or more organ systems.”

A common definition is needed because lack of a mutually understood definition presents challenges for patients, physicians and other clinicians, public health practitioners, researchers and policymakers, according to NASEM.

“Inconsistent disease terminology and meaning can confound clinicians, limit the generalizability of research findings, and inhibit patients from obtaining the recognition, care, and support they need,” Harvey V. Fineberg, chair of NASEM’s Committee on Examining the Working Definition for Long COVID, said in the report’s preface.

This slideshow presents NASEM’s definition. Next are the single or multiple symptoms, and single or multiple diagnosable conditions. Finally, there are seven important features that NASEM said physicians, other clinicians, patients, researchers and policymakers should be aware of.

All data and information come from “A Long COVID Definition: A Chronic, Systemic Disease State with Profound Consequences,” the consensus study report published June 11, 2024, and NASEM’s accompanying news release.


Related to this article

Sethu Reddy: ©Sethu Reddy
Prior authorization, step therapy and shifting coverage rules keep patients from obesity drugs with proven benefits, an endocrinologist argues — and the long-term savings make the case for broader access.
Is more health care access always better?: ©Yodiyim - stock.adobe.com
In 590,282 California heart attack hospitalizations, a new PCI-capable facility within a 30-minute drive lowered 30-day mortality 20% in communities without prior access but did not change survival where the procedure was already available.