Article
Our second quarter results show five of our six financial pros and physician investors beating the market, and one is blowing it away.
Our second quarter results show five of our six financial pros and physician investors beating the market, and one is blowing it away.
The market has finally seen some bright days, and our participants are basking in the sun.
In February, we asked three investment professionals to create hypothetical $100,000 portfolios. We later randomly selected three Medical Economics readers, who are avid investors, to join the challenge. So far, the results are impressive. The Standard & Poor's 500 Stock Index (composed of large companies) rose 16.8 percent for the six-month holding period since the contest began (Feb. 1 through July 31); our pros' portfolio returns ranged from 13.9 percent to 33.4 percent in the same time frame. The S&P 500 Stock Index rose 8.5 percent in the second quarter (May 1 through July 31), when our physician investors entered the race; their portfolios brought in from 18.7 percent to an eye-popping 94.7 percent returns in those three months.
The burst of life from small- and mid-cap stocks may account for part of the uptick. The S&P MidCap 400 Stock Index returned 13.6 percent, and the S&P SmallCap 600 Stock Index rose 16.6 percent.
Not surprisingly, family physician Michelle Taube's portfolio, which delivered the top return, contains only small-cap stocks. Most of her holdings nearly doubled in three months, and one company, 24/7 Real Media, increased almost sixfold. Still, the market can't claim all the credit; the best-performing small-cap mutual fund returned far less than Taube's portfoliojust 43.5 percentduring the quarter.
Internist Rajendra Shroff's portfolio came in second, up 39.1 percent. He sold Factory 2-U Stores and Carreker and bought Aether Systems, a provider of wireless services and software, and E.piphany, which develops marketing software.
We'll update the portfolios again in our Jan. 23, 2004 issue. Here's a closer look at where our model portfolios stand now.
"I chose stocks that were economically sensitive but could also show some earnings growth," says Duarte. "I was fortunate to catch the market right at a nice trough. The portfolio really got a boost from Apple Computer, Business Objects, and Sears Roebuck, all of which benefited from the market's expectations of an improving economy.
"Sears had been very beaten up, and took a turn upward because of improved earnings as well as the market's expectations," he says. "Apple also had shown some relative strength prior to April. It was moving sideways while the market was falling; then it moved ahead."
"My portfolio's performance is similar to that of the overall market during the same period," says Kolluri. "That's because I have a well-balanced portfolio in lieu of a more volatile arrangement of stocks, which may compromise some investors' goals.
"The market had quite an impressive showing during this quarter," says Kolluri. "Strong industries that helped lift the market included precious metals within large-cap stocks; textiles and general merchandisers within mid-caps; and leisure companies within the small-cap universe."
"Iam very pleased with my portfolio's performance. We continued to surpass the market by a nice margin," says Goldston. "I originally placed half the money in steady, large companies to provide some dividends and reduced volatility. I put the other half in more mid-size stocks that offered higher growth expectations. This balanced approach has generated market-beating returns, while avoiding the volatility and risk that can accompany some more aggressive styles."
On June 30, Goldston sold all shares of Concord EFS for $7,360 and Lockheed Martin for $7,173. The proceeds were held as cash.
"I chose my companies after doing intensive research, paying attention to diversification. These are the most important factors in picking winning companies," says Shaffer. "As a result, I'm getting some nice gains from McDonald's, Polaris Industries, and Charles Schwab. Internap Network Services, my best performing stock, was beaten down in the past few years, but strong balance sheets, a rise in earnings per share, and good decisions from the company's executive officers have ultimately boosted its share price."
"I attribute my portfolio gains partially to the fact that I hold many small-cap stocks, which are doing well, and partly to my technical analysis, which I feel is giving indicators that the market is rising in certain areas," says Shroff. "I do not have a buy-and-hold strategy. I look at the direction and various measures of the moving average, which shows the direction of average stock prices over a time period. I pay particular attention to 5, 10, and 50 days, and then buy or sell stocks based on the pattern I see. Based on those signs, I bought two new stocks, and sold two of my original holdings."
"I looked for low-priced stocks that had recently experienced small run-ups, thinking that those gains would continue in the future," says Taube. "I felt that with low-priced stocks, I could purchase more shares, and small increases in their prices would lead to large percentage increases in the portfolio. I also chose stocks that were very different from each other instead of relying on one or two types of stocks. Basically, I think that the portfolio has done well because small-cap stocks have experienced a rebound, and all of my stocks are small-caps."
Leslie Kane. Investment Derby. Medical Economics Oct. 24, 2003;80:40.