
The evolving liability landscape and obstetrical care
Hospital risk leaders are increasingly walking a liability and malpractice claim tightrope.
Hospital risk leaders are increasingly walking a tightrope and maintaining a balance of providing high quality obstetrical (OB) care at their facilities, and the risk associated with medical malpractice claims. The 2019 year proved daunting as more medical malpractice batch claims emerged, and medical malpractice claims settling or obtaining jury verdicts of more than $10 million grew 84%. And if that’s not enough to cause them to lose their balance, now there is COVID-19. However, as the COVID-19 crisis begins to slow in certain parts of the country, risk professionals can turn their attention back to strategies to provide high quality OB care that can successfully navigate the professional liability environment.
A
With this movement within medical malpractice relative costs, and the additional economic burden from COVID-19, 2020 may be the year that hospitals and OB/GYN clinicians reach a tipping point on whether they can accept any more potentially avoidable risk as merely a cost of doing business.
As they also see tightening in the professional liability pricing, risk leaders and hospital executives must revisit their processes for mitigating OB/GYN risk, and better managing the often loss leader of claims at their facility, all by ensuring high quality OB/GYN patient care that mitigates the highest areas of patient risk Whether from the magnified economic impact of COVID-19, professional liability pricing pressures, or heightened loss experience, hospitals will be forced to highlight how they are proactively and innovatively managing their risk more successfully than their counterparts to survive financially and ensure their Women’s and Children’s service lines remain profitable.
At the most extreme end of the spectrum, hospitals and clinicians can continue to respond within a fear based culture that often leads to costly defensive medicine practices not always in the best interest of the patient. Conversely, hospitals can proactively take steps to address risk mitigation and quality control and improve both quality of care and patient experience, significantly driving down the likelihood of a medical malpractice claim being successful.
Hospitals that work strategically to minimize the former and accelerate the latter will experience better legal and financial - as well as clinical - outcomes.
To start, healthcare executives should address gaps in quality management practices affecting liability. A 2016
At the heart of this process is reduction of errors and increasing risk mitigation strategies. At
Management consulting firm
In addition, hospitals need to go beyond reactive risk management and embrace intentional strategic disruption. In OB, most hospitals have relied on community OB/GYNs to “staff” Labor & Delivery departments. This traditional model yields care that can be fragmented, while adverse events related to delays are too often assumed to be part of the package.
In an OB hospitalist model, hospitals are staffed with board-certified OBs 24/7 who provide care to women at all stages of labor and delivery. When the community OB arrives, the OB hospitalist either turns over patient care or assists the community OB as needed to ensure successful co-management of the patient.
In 2016, OBHG and one of our system partners undertook a study to analyze the key risk mitigation strategies that resulted in favorable loss trends/claim reduction for the system in recent years. The study found that a 31 percent reduction in perinatal serious-harm events at hospitals was attributable to one factor: implementation of an OB hospitalist program at those facilities.
Finally, hospitals should be doing all they can to improve the patient experience. As healthcare consumers, patients have become increasingly empowered and increasingly aware of what their role is in the broader healthcare system. There’s an expectation they will receive good, high-quality care, and that they will look to an accountable party when that care falls short of their expectations. Their choices and satisfaction are reflected in hospital patient satisfaction scores and reimbursements. In the worst-case scenario, it may also be reflected in malpractice claims.
Having protocols in place and a wealth of effort expended on improving the patient experience does not necessarily correlate with good care; similarly, patients can have great care and an unfortunate adverse experience.
But in the modern age, everything is magnified and accelerated. In the past, if there was an adverse patient experience or medical events that didn't go as planned, hospital systems had some time to plan a public relations strategy and execute a response. Now, patients communicate dissatisfaction in real-time on social media, which can be very detrimental to a clinician's and/or a hospital’s reputation and risk. Going forward, hospitals and healthcare systems must be more proactive in understanding the root causes driving patient experience and their perception of care.
It's easy to respond defensively to the changing healthcare liability market, but healthcare executives are not powerless. They have the ability to take proactive measures to improve quality of care and risk reduction. Hospital and risk management executives need to master the tightrope of underlying factors that fuel a litigious environment in a holistic manner, and implement quality improvement strategies that address the underlying tensions in the market.
Heather Moore is Vice President of Risk Management, Quality, and Compliance for
Newsletter
Stay informed and empowered with Medical Economics enewsletter, delivering expert insights, financial strategies, practice management tips and technology trends — tailored for today’s physicians.