
Robo-Advisors Revisited: Why Automated Advising Isn't Flourishing
In an earlier column, we looked at what appeared to be an unstoppable trend: The move toward automated investment advice, also known as "robo-advising." Lately, however, the concept has hit a rough patch.
Though robo-advisors may fade in future years, they could leave us with a valuable legacy.
“Can investors give up the good feelings a mortal imparts in exchange for paying less for financial advice?” That is a question I asked in an
As it turns out, this conclusion may have been premature. Robo-advisors may not be here to stay. This is according to Michael Kites in his May 2 column, “
Kites tells us that the cost of gaining a client for robo-advisors such as
Nevertheless, Kites says, even if robos perish, they will have a place in the history of financial planning. This is because they challenged the investment industry with their novel computerized approach and thereby jolted it into investing in new software similar to that of robo-advisors. This created a revolutionary product for clients which Vanguard and Schwab are already using. Thus, in combination with the traditional touch of established investment companies, a morphed robo-advisor software is making an impact on the industry, though not in the package in which it was originally conceived.
For More:
Newsletter
Stay informed and empowered with Medical Economics enewsletter, delivering expert insights, financial strategies, practice management tips and technology trends — tailored for today’s physicians.