
Study: AI does well with emergency triage
AI was correct more than physicians, but it’s not ready to take over
Emergency departments worldwide face immense pressure, often dealing with overcrowding and limited resources. However, a study led by UC San Francisco suggests that
Published May 7, 2024, in
The study employed the ChatGPT-4 large language model (LLM) through UCSF's secure generative AI platform, ensuring strict privacy measures. In a sample of 10,000 matched pairs (20,000 patients), where one patient had a serious condition and the other had a less urgent one, the AI accurately identified the more critical patient 89% of the time.
Moreover, in a subset of 500 pairs assessed by both the
Lead author Christopher Williams, MB, BChir, emphasized the potential impact of AI on prioritizing patient care, envisioning scenarios where AI could assist clinicians facing multiple urgent requests, thereby optimizing resource allocation and potentially saving lives.
However, despite its promising performance, Williams cautioned against immediate implementation of AI in emergency departments. He stressed the need for further validation and clinical trials, highlighting concerns such as bias in AI models. Previous research has indicated that AI models may perpetuate racial and gender biases present in the training data.
Williams emphasized the importance of thoroughly understanding and mitigating biases before deploying AI in clinical settings. He noted ongoing efforts to address these challenges and optimize the responsible use of AI in emergency care.
While the study marks a significant step forward in harnessing AI for emergency triage, Williams underscored the necessity of ensuring that AI not only works but also benefits all patients equitably.
Newsletter
Stay informed and empowered with Medical Economics enewsletter, delivering expert insights, financial strategies, practice management tips and technology trends — tailored for today’s physicians.



















