News
Article
Author(s):
Choice is up to Congress, but plan presents a raise for 2026, with additional money for primary care.
Primary care physicians could get a financial boost if Congress were to base Medicare reimbursement on the Medicare Economic Index and add payments to doctors treating low-income beneficiaries.
The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) voted Jan. 16 to recommend Congress alter the way physicians are compensated through the program for seniors aged 65 years and older.
MedPAC recommended:
Those changes are estimated to cost billions – $2 billion to $5 billion in the first year, up to $25 billion over five years. They also would bring at least two benefits. Beneficiaries will continue having access to care and clinicians will provide it, especially for the low-income patients, according to MedPAC.
MedPAC members considered data presented by staff principal policy analysts Rachel Burton, MPP; Geoff Gerhardt, MPP; Brian O’Donnell, MPP; and Ledia Tabor, MPH. There was a two-part recommendation.
The MEI peaked in 2022 at 4.4%; a year later, spending per Medicare FFS beneficiary rose by 4.2%, and also in 2023 median compensation grew 3% for physicians and 6% for advanced practice providers, the report said.
Physicians, including Scott, and their advocacy groups repeatedly have asserted continual cuts to Medicare reimbursement would lead to more doctors declining to treat Medicare beneficiaries. Apparently beneficiaries are not seeing effects at their physicians’ offices, according to the MedPAC analysis.
“Our 2024 survey found that Medicare beneficiaries ages 65+ reported access to care that was comparable with or, in most cases, better than that of privately insured people ages 50-64,” the analysts wrote. “Comparable shares of clinicians accept patients with Medicare and private insurance.”
For traditional Medicare beneficiaries, encounters per clinician rose by 4.3% in 2023.
“The total number of clinicians is increasing, although the mix of clinicians is changing,” the report said, although quality of care remains difficult to measure.